Apple webkit app infrequentlynoted android#
Apple webkit app infrequentlynoted windows#

Apple doesn't want App Store abuse to be discussed.Fifth Circuit gives short shrift to Continental's.Apple under pressure: lost patent appeal against O.Fifth Circuit panel will straighten out its Contin.Two special circumstances make the investigation o.Apple, Continental, astroturfers use IoT as pretex.Qualcomm wins another first-class antitrust acquit.ITC staff sides with Ericsson on claim constructio.Will Apple's 'Sherlocking' practice draw antitrust.Huawei grants IoT chipmaker Nordic Semiconductor c.Quinn Emanuel scores huge EU win as German managin.Mannheim court grants Nokia patent injunction agai.Antitrust investigation of Google Maps licensing t.BREAKING: Fifth Circuit panel modifies Continental.In Ericsson 5G case, ITC staff says pursuit of imp.Munich I Regional Court reports new record number.ACT | The App(le) Association claims to represent.

Apple wants ITC to admit prior art reference out o.Anti-innovative effects of Apple's Orwellian prohi.Apple's tactical games in 5G patent dispute with E.Stats suggest Apple's browser engine monopoly pose.

Impervious to reason, Continental again wants full.

Lessons from rejection of Apple's cert petition ag.

Continental and its counsel risk abuse-of-procedur.

In closing, just like Alex Russell, let me, too, amplify Stuart Langridge's call to 'help the CMA help the Web' by providing input to the CMA (deadline: July 22).ДЇollow with other professionals via LinkedIn: uyrDBPcVF8- Stephen Shankland June 27, 2022 One data point related to (newest) post complaining Apple is hurting the web: I follow browser mailing lists, and a large fraction of the Webkit messages are browser devs requesting Apple's stance on dozens of new web standards. Safari never made it big on Windows, while Chrome did.ДЄlex Russell is right that 'Apple has foundationally imperilled the web ecosystem by destroying the utility of a diverse population of browsers and engines.' And CNET's Stephen Shankland interestingly noted that web developers are asking lots of questions about where Apple stands on new web standards, i.e., whether and how WebKit will implement them:

Apple webkit app infrequentlynoted windows#

If you let Apple and Google compete on the merits, such as on Windows where neither Apple nor Google benefits from the Power of Default or simply disallows competition, Google will win.

Apple webkit app infrequentlynoted android#

Only on Android does Google leverage its market power in another field to strengthen Chrome. Google antitrust complaint mentions Chrome, but only in contexts where Google leverages its power over Chrome to maintain its search engine monopoly. OK, some antitrust enforcement accelerated its adoption-but that's precisely what is needed against Apple's single-browser-engine policy now. However, apart from Android, where Google leverages the Power of Default, Chrome actually managed to compete on the merits. Apple is the gatekeeper standing between the technology industry at large and one billion users-by some describes as the world's richest billion people, which is not completely off base, though fortunately even some rich people prefer Android.ДЇar be it from me to deny that the concentration of power in Google's hands with its search engine, ad network, Android, and Chrome raises concerns. The suggestion that a browser monoculture on iOS is needed to prevent a browser monoculture on the Internet as a whole is a 'fight fire with fire' argument. It's just more profitable and more comfortable to abuse a typical aftermarket monopoly. Apple would have plenty of resources-and resource allocation is at the heart of Alex Russell's concerns-to compete on the merits. The argument with which Apple apologists seek to defend the Webkit engine monopoly is that Chrome and other browsers based on the Chromium engine would otherwise take over and turn the web into a browser monoculture.

It's like Apple-the tyrant-telling developers: 'heads I win, tails you lose.' The fact that Apple allows only one browser engine on iOS-even Chrome for iOS is not really Chrome, but merely Safari in disguise, as it must be based on Apple's WebKit engine-is a serious problem, especially because Apple argues in the App Store context that developers should simply make web apps, while doing everything to ensure that those web apps won't be a practical alternative to native apps. On other recent occasions I've mentioned the UK Competition & Market Authority's market investigation into mobile browsers and cloud gaming.

Today I wish to draw some additional attention to long-time web browser developer Alex Russell's new post, Apple Is Not Defending Browser Engine Choice.